| Home | Message Board | Pick 'em Page | Picks & Results | Pt Standings | Wkly Composites | Official Rules | Awards | Record Archives | Handicapper Capsules |
![]() |
Bookie Challenge WEEKLY REVIEW October 2, 2026 | Issue #3 | Week #3 |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Parts Unknown (DP--Disassociated Press): Don't look now, but this year's rookies are slowly starting to make waves in the 16th annual Bookie Challenge competition. In the previous weekend of week #2, JamesGang had hit on his first-career 6-point parlay winner, and as a result, he immediately shot up the overall point standings to put himself in serious contention to possibly win one of the five top seeds at this year's divisional seeding, which will take place at the conclusion of week #8 of this year's regular season. Also to note about JamesGang's overall 7-point outing in week #2, is that he became the first participant this season to be credited with a "week-won" after he had edged out a red-hot kr@tos by one point to capture the week outright. Flash forward to this past weekend, and lo and behold, for the second consecutive week a rookie once again got credited with a "week won" after rookie Jonnybucs won the weekend outright, and did as much by producing a rare 4-point outing. Specifically, the "Floridian Pirate" (Jonathon's new and well deserved Bookie Challenge moniker) was able to collect the odd sum of four points after he connected on a seldom attempted 3-point parlay combination and after he also nailed down one best-bet winner. Elsewhere around the league, a previously red-hot scorching handicapper, Kr@tos, goosed egged his outing but still managed to cling to first place in the competition's point standings. However, the scoreless outing by the Handicapping God of War (Kr@tos) enabled all of his closest pursuers to nudge closer to his league-leading 13 points. Markedly, the four closest pursuers in the point standing who trail Kr@tos for the overall lead in the standings are all presently occupying the final four top seeds in the standings: 2nd-place/2nd seed Driveline (10 pts), technically in 3rd place/3rd seed JamesGang (also 10 pts--but loses tiebreaker to Driveline), 4th-place/4th seed the Biased Nihilist (9pts), and 5th-place/5th seed Matty_Ice (8 pts). Underneath the group of the five top seeds are three handicappers--Vikings17, jcvike28, and Jonnybucs--who are each tied for 6th place in the point standings with five points apiece. But after incorporating the league's tiebreakers to break the 3-way tie, the technical order in the point standings of the three aforementioned handicappers are as follows: Vikings17 in 6th-place, jcvike28 in 7th place, and Jonnybucs in 8th place. What's important to remember is that although Vikings17, jcvike28, and Jonnybucs are all three points from occupying a top seed in the standings, they are all presently a PERFECTA's distance from Kr@tos's overall lead in the point standings. All things considered, the big story of this past weekend was how rookie Jonnybucs, aka the "Floridian Pirate", was finally able to get his footing underneath him after having an inauspicious start to the first-two weeks of his rookie debut. To illustrate just how wishy-washy was Jonnybucs' start to this season, and even though he had managed a best-bet winner in his first outing of his Bookie Challenge career, he botched his week #1 preseason Super Bowl picks and had them all disqualified. Having no preseason Super Bowl selections to take into a Bookie Challenge postseason could have a detrimental effect to a participants chance's to take it to the house and win an overall Bookie Challenge championship. In any event, as an encore to Jonnybucs' opening-week disaster, he only posted one best bet in week #2 and he also submitted a three-team parlay combination that included his only best bet in the combination, thus he created a parlay combo that was worth only three points. Nobody except Jonnybucs knows if his three-team parlay combination in week #2 was an inadvertent posting mistake or if it was a strategically intentional attempt at a 3-point parlay winner. However, after this past weekend (wk #3), after Jonnybucs created a second-consecutive 3-point parlay combination, it became obvious that he entered this past weekend compelled to start his rookie season by shooting for 3-point parlay winners, or at least that's what can be surmised after seeing Jonnybucs' sets of weekly picks for the second and third weeks of this year's regular season. Surprisingly, in just his third week of his first-ever Bookie Challenge competition, the "Floridian Pirate" caught the Challenge field off-guard after he grinded out the following 3-point parlay winner: KC -10 (over Mia), Buff -7 (over LA Chargers), and the NY Giants -3 (over Tenn). He also doubled down on the G-men as his only best bet selection to win a 4th point on the weekend. Because Jonnybucs is a rookie in this year's competition, he's probably oblivious to the fact that, by far, the vast majority of the league's handicappers overwhelmingly submit 6-point parlay combinations throughout a Bookie Challenge competition. In fact, the last 3-point parlay combination that was undertaken in the Bookie Challenge was attempted by Kr@tos, who utilized the rare 3-point stratagem in the first week of last year's competition (Challenge year #15)--AND HE NAILED IT! But before Kr@tos gunned down his 3-point parlay to start off last year's competition, the previous time anyone connected on a 3-point parlay winner since Kr@tos' parlay winner was eight years prior, in Challenge year #7. Back then, a two-year participant named "ibbill" produced a 3-point parlay winner in week #8 of that year's regular season, but ibbill's story makes for a strong argument as to why 3-point parlay attempts should be tried sparingly, very sparingly. What first has to be pointed out about ibbill and his unusual penchant for submitting 3-point parlay combinations is that he easily holds the all-time Bookie Challenge record for attempting the most 3-point parlay combinations in the history of the competition. For example, in his rookie season of Challenge year #6, ibbill attempted 3-point parlay combinations for 12-straight weeks, from week #3 through week #13 (2nd outing of that yr's Turkey Shoot), but he only connected on one of those 12 consecutive attempts, of which his only 3-point parlay winner occurred in week #7 of that year's regular season. Interestingly, however, after his last 3-point parlay attempt in week #13 of his rookie season of Challenge year #6, ibbill at the time was so far behind in his divisional race that he had no other option but to abandon his 3-point parlay combinations and start going after the 6-point combos. In a head scratcher, he managed to connect on a 6-point parlay winner on the last week of his rookie season of Challenge year #6 for a 7-point outing. Oddly, ibbill's second season and last season of his short Bookie Challenge career saw the two-year veteran attempt to duplicate the same flawed handicapping pattern from his rookie season of Challenge year #6. And so it went in Challenge year #7 that ibbill submitted 3-point parlay combinations for the first-nine weeks of that year's regular season, with him winning only one 3-point parlay winner in week #8. Unbelievably, almost as if on cue, ibbill would connect on two 6-point parlay hits later on in the regular season of Challenge year #7, with one of them being a PERFECTA outing! In sum, which should probably be some food for thought for Jonnybucs, ibbill attempted 21 overall 3-point parlay combinations in the two years he participated in the Bookie Challenge competition and he only connected on two of those 3-point parlay attempts. Conversely, he knocked down THREE 6-point parlay winners during that same two-year time frame. |
| WEEKLY ODDS AND ENDS: THE HANDICAPPING HODGEPODGE |
|
| CHALLENGE FIELD: WEEKLY COMBINED STATS AND HAPPENINGS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| WHO'S HOT AND WHO'S NOT |
| WHO'S HOT: Jonnybucs Rookie Jonnybucs finally turned things around in week #3, and as a result, he earned his first good Bookie Challenge moniker--"The Floridian Pirate". But even after landing an unorthodox 4-pt outing in week #3 to corral his first-ever "week-won", Jonnybucs still has a lot to prove in this year's competition if the rest of the league's veterans, especially the league's long-tenured veterans, will take the greenhorn as a serious contender. In others, the Floridian Pirate is going to have to prove to the rest of the Challenge field that he has the swashbuckling flair to make some waves in his rookie debut and become a somebody in the vaunted Bookie Challenge competition. As already questioned in this weekly review's main article, will Jonnybucs stick with submitting 3-point parlay combinations for the time being, or will he change it up and start going for the bigger points that only 6-point parlay combos can bring on a given weekend? Case in point, the Floridian Pirate heads into this upcoming weekend eight points behind the overall lead in the point standings, of which only a PERFECTA outing can result in an 8-point outing. Or will the upstart newcomer bide his time and display an unfaltering patience to keep shooting for 3-point parlay combos so that he can at least slowly but surely gain one of the top-five seeds in the point standings before this year's divisional seeding takes place? But it's first things first for the huge Buccaneers' fan, he must stay on the new course he has embarked on and stay away from committing anymore rookie screw ups. Then, and only then, can the rest of the league start taking him seriously. |
| WHO'S NOT: TCU There's a saying in the Bookie Challenge competition that goes as follows: "If you do good in the Bookie Challenge competition, you'll be put on a pedestal in the weekly reviews, but if you fuck up in the competition, if your handicapping stinks up the joint, then there's no place to hide because the weekly reviews will definitely find you". Now granted, TCU has been able to fly underneath the radar after the first-two weeks of this season and has stealthily avoided being pegged as the WHO'S-NOT-HOT-HANDICAPPER of the league, but he is no longer getting the benefit of the doubt, not this week, anyway. Yeah, the rookies are finally starting to come around, are starting to get noticed, so now it's time for Too Tall Tommy to answer for his atrocious handicapping. A question has to be asked of TCU after he has goose egged the first-three outings of this season and sits in dead-last place in the competition's point standings after accumulating a league-leading worst 0-6-0 best-bet record (Win% .000!). What's the question? WHAT THE HELL HAS HAPPENED TO TOO TALL TOMMY?! Without a shadow of a doubt, the non-existent handicapping start to this season is the worst ever by Too Tall Tommy. In fact, if Too Tall Tommy doesn't find another horse to ride--and soon!--he's going to wind up being buried on boot hill. And trust me, that's not a hill he wants to die at. But the fact is that TCU in the upcoming weekend (wk #4) is on the verge of tying some pretty sick all-time Bookie Challenge records. For example, if he goes scoreless this upcoming weekend and plops down another goose egg, he'll tie the all-time records for the most consecutive scoreless outings (4 wks), the most consecutive goose eggs (4 wks), and he'll also still be in line to challenge the all-time record for the most consecutive best-bet losses, of which the all-time consecutive best-bet losses are presently at 10 best-bet losses in a row. DawgPound is the unlucky handicapper who set the best-bet losing streak back in Challenge year #10. What's really disturbing about TCU's latest slump, a "slump" that has essentially been going on for the span of the last four years, or ever since Challenge year #12, is that TCU started his Challenge career back in Challenge year #7 with a lot of promise. For starters, Too Tall Tommy won the Rookie-of-the-Year award back in Challenge year #7, and right from the start, he quickly build a reputation for being a very good best-bet handicapper, so good was his best-bet handicapping within his first few years in The Bookie Challenge that he rivaled dbucc as being one of the top best-bet handicappers in the league. Not only did TCU start off his Challenge career with some very adept best-bet handicapping, but he showed a noticeable propensity for knocking down 6-point parlay winners, as in he nailed four 6-point parlay hits for each of the regular seasons of Challenge years' #11 and #9. What's more, after his first-five seasons handicapping the competition, Too Tall Tommy sandwiched a playoff qualification of a divisional champion in between four divisional wild-card qualifications. In Challenge year #10, his 5th season handicapping the competition, TCU damn-near won an overall Bookie Challenge championship. Unfortunately for him, he finished that year's postseason in second place just six points behind the eventual Bookie Challenge champion Tony Soprano (Soprano 29 pts, TCU 23 pts). However, TCU's second place finish in the postseason of Challenge year #10 enabled him to win his first and only Ferengi awrd of $100. AddtionalLy, because his tremendous handicapping resolve in the playoffs of Challenge year #10, Too Tall Tommy was honored with that year's highly lauded Rudy award. But as mentioned earlier, TCU's handicapping game started to go south from Challenge year 312 and leading up to this year's competition. From Challenge year #12 until the start of this season, TCU has only qualified for the postseason as an at-large participant. In addition, his parlay game after Challenge year #11 dropped off considerably, as he could only total four combined 6-point parlay wins since year #11. Comparatively, TCU produced four parlay hits in one season twice before (Challenge yrs' #11 and #9). And finally, in last year's competition (yr #15), TCU essentially hit rock bottom for regular-season handicapping. He ended last year's regular season with career-lows for total points accrued (24) and best-bet record (12-23-3 Win% .343). Worst of all, the 23 best-bet losses that TCU accrued in last year's competition set the all-time record for the most best-bet losses in the history of the Bookie Challenge's regular seasons. All in all, it should be needless to say that Too Tall Tommy has his work cut out for himself if he wants to right his ship and become a serious contender once again in the Bookie Challenge competition. |
| POINT STANDINGS (Thru Week #3) | ||||||||||||||
| Total Pts | Participant | Best Bet Record | Win % | Weeks Won | Exact Scores 5pt---------2pt--------1pt |
Propositional Pts | 3pt Parlays | 6pt Parlays | Perfectas | Goose Eggs | Golden Goose-Eggs | Wins in Parlays | ||
| 13 Pts | Kr@tos | 2-4-0 | .33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| 10 Pts | Driveline* | 4-2-0 | .667 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 10 Pts | JamesGang* | 4-2-0 | .667 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 9 Pts | B.Nihilist* | 3-3-0 | .500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| 8 Pts | Matty_Ice | 2-4-0 | .333 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 5 Pts | Vikings17 | 5-1-0 | .833 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 5 Pts | jcvike28* | 5-1-0 | .833 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 5 Pts | Jonnybucs* | 2-3-0 | .400 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| 3 Pts | HOF City Kid* | 3-3-0 | .500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| 3 Pts | KingDarsh* | 3-3-0 | .500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 3 Pts | dbucc* | 3-2-1 | .600 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 2 Pts | Brooklyn211* | 2-4-0 | .333 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| 2 Pts | catman23* | 2-4-0 | .333 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| 2 Pts | 7mick7* | 2-3-1 | .400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| 2 Pts | Blitzkrieg* | 2-3-1 | .400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 2 Pts | Jets69 | 2-4-0 | .333 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 2 Pts | DawgPound* | 2-4-0 | .333 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 2 Pts | Kennypie86* | 1-5-0 | .167 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1pt(x1) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 0 Pts | TCU* | 0-6-0 | .000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Statistics in BOLD denotes participant leads league in statistical category. | ||||||||||||||
| *Asterisk next to participant's name denotes participant's Latinum has been received. Total projected jackpot: $950 (Current jackpot: $700). Projected splits of jackpot: 1st-place prize at end of playoffs $500, 2nd-place prize at end of playoffs $200, 3rd-place prize Regular-season champion $150, and 4th-place prize overall Top Seed from divisional seeding (Wk#8) $100. | ||||||||||||||
| INDIVIDUAL PICKS (NFL WEEK #3) (Note: Participants are listed in order in which they posted their picks) |
||||||||||||||||||
| Participant | Best Bets | Parlay | Exact Scores | Propositional Picks | Results >>>>> | Total Pts | W-L-T | Week Won | Exact-Scores 5pt------2pt------1pt |
Propositional Pts | 3pt parlay | 6pt parlay | Perfecta | Goose Egg | Golden Goose-Egg | Wins in Parlay | ||
| DawgPound | GB-4½-L LAR-2½-L |
Cle+3-W SF-9-L Phil-5-L |
GB 24-16 Phi 24-20 |
N/A | >>>>> | 0 pts | 0-2-0 | GE | 1/3 | |||||||||
| JamesGang | Buff-7-W Det-6½-W |
Cin-3-L SF-9-L Sea-7-L |
GB 24-17 Phi 17-10 |
N/A | >>>>> | 2 pts | 2-0-0 | 0/3 | ||||||||||
| Jonnybucs | NYG-3-W Sea-7-L |
KC-10-W Buff-7-W NYG-3-W |
GB 27-21 Phi 27-14 |
N/A | >>>>> | 4 pts | 1-1-0 | WW | 3pt | W-3/3 | ||||||||
| Matty_Ice | LAR-2½-L Sea-7-L |
LAR/Dal-O?-DQ KC/Mia-O47-DQ Ten/NYG-U39-DQ |
GB 23-19 Chi 34-30 |
N/A | >>>>> | 0 pts | 0-2-0 | GE | DQ | |||||||||
| Kennypie86 | GB-4½-L Car-3-L |
Cin-3-L Buff-7-W Min/TB-O43-L |
GB 24-17 Chi 27-24-W-1pt |
N/A | >>>>> | 1 pts | 0-2-0 | 1pt | XS-1pt | 1/3 | ||||||||
| Driveline | NO-3-L Jax-3-W |
TB+2-L Cle+3-W Den+3-W |
GB 27-17 Phi 23-16 |
N/A | >>>>> | 1 pts | 1-1-0 | 2/3 | ||||||||||
| jcvike28 | Det-6½-W Ten/NYG-U38½-W |
Sea-7-L Cin-3-L KC-10-W |
GB 24-20 Phi 24-17 |
N/A | >>>>> | 2 pts | 2-0-0 | 1/3 | ||||||||||
| dbucc | Ten/NYG-U38½-W Sea-7-L |
Cin-3-L Buff-7-W KC-10-W |
GB 27-20 Phi 27-13 |
N/A | >>>>> | 1 pts | 1-1-0 | 2/3 | ||||||||||
| Jets69 | Car-3-L Phil-4½-L |
Cin-3-L LV+3-W Jax-3-W |
Atl 21-17 Phi 27-17 |
N/A | >>>>> | 0 pts | 0-2-0 | GE | 2/3 | |||||||||
| TCU | Sea-7-L Phil-4½-L |
Hou/Ind-O43-L Dall+3-L Ten/NYG-U39-W |
GB 28-10 Phi 35-9 |
N/A | >>>>> | 0 pts | 0-2-0 | GE | 1/3 | |||||||||
| Kr@tos | Car-3-L Min/TB-O42½-L |
Minn-2-W KC-10-W Sea-7-L |
GB 31-17 Phi 27-24 |
N/A | >>>>> | 0 pts | 0-2-0 | GE | 2/3 | |||||||||
| B.Nihilist | Det-6½-W LAR-2½-L |
Cin-3-L Buff-7-W LV+3-W |
GB 27-23 Phi 24-17 |
N/A | >>>>> | 1 pts | 1-1-0 | 2/3 | ||||||||||
| Vikings17 | GB-4½-L Atl/GB-O42½-W |
Balt-3-L Ari/SF-O48-W Den+3-W |
GB 27-20 Phi 27-20 |
N/A | >>>>> | 1 pts | 1-1-0 | 2/3 | ||||||||||
| 7mick7 | GB-4½-L KC-10½-W |
Balt-3-L LAC/Buf-O51-L Ten/NYG-U39-W |
GB 34-17 Phi 24-20 |
N/A | >>>>> | 1 pts | 1-1-0 | 1/3 | ||||||||||
| HOF City Kid | Sea-7-L KC-10½-W |
Pitts+3-W TB+2-L Det-7-L |
Atl 27-21 Phi 27-21 |
N/A | >>>>> | 1 pts | 1-1-0 | 1/3 | ||||||||||
| Brooklyn211 | Buff-7-W Det-6½-W |
Car/Cle-U43-W Ten/NYG-U39-W SF-9-L |
Atl 24-20 Phi 21-10 |
N/A | >>>>> | 2 pts | 2-0-0 | 2/3 | ||||||||||
| Blitzkrieg | Phil-4½-L Sea-7-L |
Jax-3-W NO-3-L Cin-3-L |
NoPick Phi 27-17 |
N/A | >>>>> | 0 pts | 0-2-0 | GE | 1/3 | |||||||||
| catman23 | Cin-3½-L Car-3-L |
LAR-3-L KC-10-W Dall+3-L |
NoPick Phi 14-7 |
N/A | >>>>> | 0 pts | 0-2-0 | GE | 1/3 | |||||||||
| KingDarsh | Balt-3½-L Pitts+3½-W |
Det-7-L Buff-7-W NYJ/Det-U48-L |
NoPick Phi 21-3 |
N/A | >>>>> | 1 pts | 1-1-0 | 1/3 | ||||||||||
| FINALS | ATL 35 GB 14 |
WASH 33 SEA 31 |
PITTS 30 CIN 27 |
DET 31 NYJ 24 |
NYG 12 TENN 17 |
JAX 35 NE 6 |
KC 24 MIA 10 |
IND 19 HOU 17 |
CLE 21 CAR 18 |
BUFF 24 LAC 16 |
MINN 23 TB 16 |
SF 36 ARI 30 |
LV 35 NO 27 |
BALT 34 DALL 31 |
DEN 30 LAR 26 |
CHI 27 PHIL 7 |
| PREVIOUS REVIEWS | Wk#1 | Wk#2 |